Photo by Andreas Felske on Unsplash
Twenty-Sixth Sunday in Ordinary Time
Some years back when I was a newly ordained priest teaching at an all-boys Catholic high school in New Orleans, my students would confront me on occasion with outrageous statements of disbelief. “You’re a priest. You can’t do that.”
I’d give them a look. “And what exactly am I not supposed to do?” I would ask.
“That,” they would say as they make indeterminate hand gestures.
“What? Ride a bike? Play the guitar? Wear shorts and a T-shirt? Visit the French Quarter during Mardi Gras?”
“Uh-huh.”
“And why not?”
“Priests just don’t do that stuff.”
“They don’t? Does it say that in the manual? And can I borrow your copy when you’re done, because I didn’t get one?”
They thought their expectations were perfectly reasonable. Now, I have since revised my response, the one I should have given then, which happens when I’m not quick on the uptake, which is most of the time. And it goes like this. “I’m sorry I am probably not like most priests you have known. Give me time. I’ll get there one day, just not quite yet.” And I know some of you think I’m well on my way.
We’ve all come across ridiculous expectations of some kind or other along the way. Having taught in a classroom, these are examples from teaching.
“You gave me a D in Algebra, which just cost me a college academic scholarship to an Ivy League University, and a career in International Finance.”
“Um, you earned an F. I gave you a D because I thought you could do better.”
“Can I raise my final grade if I did some extra credit work?”
“You don’t understand. Extra credit only works if you do the regular work first.”
“My parents told me I can’t play football/baseball/basketball if I don’t get better than C’s.”
“Well then, you’ve got your work cut out, don’t you?”
It is safe to think we all have reasonable expectations of ourselves and of others. For instance, the Golden Rule is a much highly-regarded standard. “If you want to be treated with respect, you need to treat others with respect. So if you are disrespectful, people will more than likely be disrespectful back.”
Most professional fields have a code of ethical behavior, sometimes clearly articulated, sometimes implied. “You get to work on time, dress appropriately, behave responsibly, and don’t steal, cheat, or lie. You give your employer an honest day’s work for an honest day’s pay. You treat your customers with kindness always.”
Now some popular standards may not always apply, but we get the reason why we have them. For instance, “The customer is always right.” But what do you do if the customer is under the influence, abusive, or violent? You can call the manager. But that is not always an option.
It all comes down to reasonable expectations. It might be more challenging in this current climate of instant outrage. So we do our best to de-escalate. Don’t get confrontational. And after things settle down, review what happened and learn something useful for next time.
Reasonable expectations are not always widely regarded. Like common sense, reasonable expectations are often not common at all. But today’s scripture readings challenge us to an even higher standard still.
The prophet Amos unloads on the complacent “lying on beds of ivory, stretched comfortably on their couches.” There’s nothing inherently wrong with being rich, until Amos points out that “they are not made ill by the collapse of Joseph!” They are not outraged by the collapse of society’s safety net! He is referring, of course, to the hungry and the destitute that surround the decadent and wasteful who squander their resources on brazen displays of extravagance and overindulgence, on gold ornaments and military parades. These are the people who will lead the procession into exile. Their sin was their complacency and indifference, being oblivious and unresponsive to the needs of their neighbor.
Jesus revisits the lesson of the prophet Amos with a parable. There was a rich man who dressed in purple garments and fine linen, and dined sumptuously each day. In and of itself, there is nothing wrong with that, unless illegal or immoral activity is involved, which it seems is not. But Jesus points out that the rich man’s fault was his failure to be moved by the needs of the poor man who sat at his door for weeks and months, hungry and covered with sores. He could have done something, but he didn’t.
And when the rich man in torment sought relief from Abraham by asking that he send Lazarus “to dip his finger in water and cool my tongue,” he couldn’t see how his lack of compassion toward Lazarus had any bearing on his request.
“Have pity on me,” he says to Abraham, when he himself failed to help Lazarus.
“Can’t,” Abraham tells him.
“Then send him to my father’s house to warn my brothers, lest they too come to this place of torment.”
Suddenly he is concerned for his brothers, who he knows share his disregard for the poor and the hungry. I believe this complacency and indifference is learned behavior. So the opposite must also be true, that compassion and genuine care for the welfare of one’s neighbor is behavior that can be taught. Are we concerned at all about what our young people are learning? We teach them by word and example to love and value the principles, ideals, and morals we love and value. So if they are learning instead principles, ideals, and morals that are contrary to ours or less than Christian, either they are learning the wrong things from us, or they are learning them from someone else.
Now when we look around, there also seems to be an overabundance of hungry and poor people, and we only have so much to give. But Jesus doesn’t require us to give a specific amount or percentage of our resources. In St. Paul’s second letter to the Corinthians 9: 7 he writes that God loves a cheerful giver. Helping people in need even under duress may not be ideal, but it is still preferable to indifference and complacency. We can’t help everyone, but we can help some. We might not be able to physically assist those far away from us geographically. Some of us can. But the rest of us can support organizations that do. And we can certainly help those who are near—the homeless, the hungry, the suffering, those who sit at our door, like Lazarus who sat at the rich man’s door. Some of us will be moved to give money or write a check. Most of us do that well. Some will be inspired to hold a fundraiser or set up a foundation. Some are in a position to pass legislation or mobilize the global community. But we are not all millionaires. We are not all members of Congress. We can’t do everything, but each of us can do something. Will we have any trouble pleading with God to have compassion on us and then recall how we were unwilling to show compassion to our neighbor in need?
These days we hear no end of suffering and hunger and devastation in far-away places like Gaza and Ukraine and Haiti, to say nothing of those adversely affected by the loss of jobs and homes and opportunity in cities across our country, along with the homeless and hungry in our own city and local communities. Some of them have been there for a while sitting at our door.
So what will it take for us to notice Lazarus at our door?
Rolo B Castillo © 2025

Fr. Rolo,
We are sorry to hear about the passing of your father. May you soon find peace and comfort. Cherish the memories, and he will forever live in your heart.
Nancy and Joe Rader
Thank you Nancy & Joe. We are grateful for the gift of his life, so he lives on in the lessons the taught us and the example of his life.
Thank you once again for a beautiful homily. We are sorry for the loss of your father. Please accept our sympathy and prayers for your family. May perpetual shine upon him, may he rest in peace.
Kevin & Angie McFarling
Let marriage be honored among all (Hebrews 13:4)
Thank you Angie & Kevin. We surround one another these days with great comfort and consolation.
Thank you, Father. So timely for all of us. Please know you and your family are in my prayers as you grieve the loss of your Dad. Knowing he has reached his reward is a comfort. Miss you and your wisdom each any every day. Blessings, Linda
>
Thanks Linda. He went peacefully which was a gift. And he lived to be 93, well beyond both his parents. I will miss him for a long time, but I hope I had learned the lessons he wanted to teach.